Wiza vs Prospeo compared on pricing, accuracy, and one thing most reviews skip: what happens when your Sales Navigator seat lapses.
Pick Wiza if your team already pays for LinkedIn Sales Navigator and wants a fast way to pull verified emails and phone numbers straight off search results and lists. Pick Prospeo if you want an email and phone finder that works from a name and company alone, with no LinkedIn dependency and no per-seat Sales Navigator bill sitting underneath it.
Both tools solve the same job: turning a LinkedIn profile or a name-plus-company pair into a verified contact. Wiza does it by riding on top of Sales Navigator's search and list infrastructure. Prospeo does it with its own lookup engine that runs independent of LinkedIn entirely.
That difference sounds small until your Sales Navigator renewal gets cut from the budget, or a teammate hits LinkedIn's list export cap mid-quarter. Then it's the whole story.
What is a LinkedIn-dependent contact finder? A contact finder that requires an active Sales Navigator (or LinkedIn) login and search session to operate. It extracts data from LinkedIn's own search results and lists rather than an independent database, so its accuracy and uptime are tied to your LinkedIn account status and LinkedIn's own rate limits.
Wiza plugs into LinkedIn and Sales Navigator search results, list exports, and Sales Navigator lists, then runs each profile through its own email and phone verification layer before handing you a clean CSV.
You search inside LinkedIn or Sales Navigator like normal, point Wiza at the results, and it bulk-extracts and verifies contact data from what LinkedIn already shows you. It does not have its own standalone database you can search without LinkedIn open.
Prospeo works from a name and a company domain (or a LinkedIn URL you paste in, if you have one), and returns verified emails and mobile numbers from its own lookup index, no LinkedIn session required.
You can run it through the API, a bulk CSV upload, or the Chrome extension against LinkedIn profiles if you happen to be browsing there, but the underlying lookup doesn't depend on LinkedIn being available or your Sales Navigator seat being active.
Wiza's paid plans start around $49 a month; Prospeo's start at $39 a month, but the real cost comparison depends on what a single lookup consumes and whether credits expire.
Wiza's free tier gives 20 email credits and 5 phone credits a month. The Starter plan runs $49 a month for 100 credits, the Email plan is $99 a month for 500-plus verified emails, and the Email+Phone plan is $199 a month for 500 of each, dropping to $166 a month if you pay annually (Cleanlist, checked August 2026). Wiza credits do not roll over.
Prospeo's free plan includes 75 credits a month. Paid tiers run Basic at $39 a month for 1,000 credits, Pro at $99 a month for 5,000 credits, Business at $199 a month for 20,000 credits, and Corporate at $369 a month for 50,000 credits. Finding a verified email costs 1 credit, verifying an email you already have costs 0.5 credits, and a mobile number costs 10 credits (FullEnrich, checked August 2026). Prospeo doesn't discount for annual billing, and credits reset monthly with no rollover either.
Say your team needs 1,000 verified emails a month. On Wiza that's roughly two Email plans stacked (about $198), since a single plan tops out around 500. On Prospeo, the Basic plan's 1,000 credits covers it for $39. The math flips hard in Prospeo's favor at pure email volume, but Wiza's phone data and native Sales Navigator workflow are the reason people pay the premium.
Neither vendor's advertised accuracy holds up unchanged in independent testing, and the gap between the two is smaller than either marketing page suggests.
An independent audit of over 1.3 million lookups run between March and May 2026 found Wiza returned an email 55.2% of the time, the highest hit rate among the tools tested, though the study measured whether an email was found, not whether it later bounced (Pin, checked August 2026). Separate field reports put Wiza's real-world bounce rate in the 8 to 15% range, with verified emails landing closer to 90 to 95% deliverability in practice.
Prospeo doesn't appear in that same benchmark, so treat any accuracy claim from its own marketing as unverified until a comparable third-party test exists. The honest takeaway: run your own 100-contact test batch on both before committing a budget line to either one.
| Factor | Wiza | Prospeo | InboundLabs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Requires LinkedIn/Sales Navigator | Yes, for search and extraction | No, works from name + domain | No |
| Entry paid price | $49/mo (100 credits) | $39/mo (1,000 credits) | Free to start, no credit card required |
| Free tier | 20 email + 5 phone credits/mo | 75 credits/mo | Free to start, no credit card required |
| Credit rollover | No | No | Not applicable, monthly plans |
| Contract terms | Monthly or annual (17% off) | Monthly only, flat pricing | Monthly plans, no annual lock-in |
| Independent hit rate | 55.2% (Pin, 2026) | Not independently benchmarked | Not independently benchmarked |
| Phone data | Yes, on Email+Phone tiers | Yes, 10 credits per number | Verified direct dials, not switchboard numbers |
| Database size / signals | Relies on LinkedIn's graph | Own lookup index | 280M verified B2B contacts with buyer intent signals |
*Sources: Cleanlist, checked August 2026; FullEnrich, checked August 2026; Pin, checked August 2026.*
Wiza's biggest strength is how tightly it fits into an existing Sales Navigator workflow. If your team already lives in Sales Navigator lists, Wiza turns a search into a verified export in a few clicks, and its 55.2% hit rate in independent testing is genuinely strong.
The tradeoff is total dependency. No Sales Navigator seat, no Wiza extraction. And Sales Navigator Core alone runs $89.99 a month per seat billed annually, or $119.99 month to month (Salesmotion, checked August 2026), a cost that sits underneath Wiza's own subscription and rarely gets mentioned in the same breath.
Prospeo's strength is independence. It doesn't care if your LinkedIn account gets rate-limited, if a teammate's Sales Navigator seat lapses, or if LinkedIn changes its export rules again. Flat pricing with no annual markup is also refreshingly simple to budget against.
Its weakness is the flip side of that independence: no public third-party accuracy benchmark exists yet, and its phone number credits (10 per lookup) get expensive fast if direct dials are your priority. It's also a leaner tool overall, with fewer workflow features than Wiza's list-based extraction.
If your workflow genuinely depends on browsing LinkedIn profiles one at a time and clicking a browser extension mid-scroll, neither Wiza nor Prospeo nor InboundLabs replaces that motion by itself. InboundLabs is a database you search directly by filtering by industry, headcount, region, and title, not a LinkedIn companion tool, so a rep who only prospects through LinkedIn search will still want a LinkedIn-native workflow layered on top.
The Sales Navigator Dependency is the framework for judging any LinkedIn-adjacent contact tool: the more a vendor's lookup depends on an active Sales Navigator session, the more your contact pipeline is exposed to a single point of failure you don't control.
One line to remember it by: if your Sales Navigator seat lapses and your contact tool stops working with it, you don't own a data pipeline, you own a LinkedIn plugin.
If you're weighing Wiza against Prospeo because you're tired of either paying for a Sales Navigator seat just to extract contacts, or you're not confident in either tool's accuracy without a Sales Navigator subscription behind it, a standalone contact database sidesteps the question entirely. InboundLabs gives you filter by industry, headcount, region, and title directly against a database of 280M verified B2B contacts, no LinkedIn seat required to search.
See how InboundLabs finds verified contacts instantly → inboundlabs.app
Wiza and Prospeo solve the same problem from opposite directions. Wiza rides LinkedIn's own search infrastructure and wins on features and phone data, as long as you're comfortable paying for Sales Navigator underneath it. Prospeo strips that dependency out entirely and wins on flat, simple pricing at high email volume.
Neither company's accuracy claims should be taken at face value; only Wiza has an independent hit-rate figure to point to as of August 2026. Run your own small test batch, watch how each performs against contacts you can verify manually, and let that decide the call, not the pricing page.
If what you actually want is a contact source that never depends on a LinkedIn login in the first place, that's a different category of tool, and worth comparing separately.
No. Wiza extracts and verifies contact data from LinkedIn and Sales Navigator search results and lists, so it needs an active LinkedIn session to function. Without a Sales Navigator seat, Wiza's core extraction workflow does not run.
No. Prospeo can look up verified emails and phone numbers from just a name and company domain through its own index, though it also offers a Chrome extension for pulling data directly off LinkedIn profiles if you have them open.
At pure email volume, Prospeo is cheaper: its Basic plan gives 1,000 credits for $39 a month versus Wiza's roughly $198 to cover the same volume across two Email plans. Wiza's phone data and Sales Navigator integration are the reason its premium exists.
An independent 2026 audit of 1.3 million lookups found Wiza returned an email 55.2% of the time, the highest of the tools tested, though it measured hit rate, not bounce rate. Prospeo has no comparable independent benchmark published as of August 2026.
No, neither tool rolls over unused credits. Wiza and Prospeo both reset your credit balance at the start of each billing cycle, so unused credits are forfeited.
You can use Prospeo entirely without Sales Navigator. Wiza requires an active LinkedIn or Sales Navigator login to extract from search results and lists, so its subscription cost sits on top of whatever you already pay LinkedIn.
Not exactly, but a standalone contact database like InboundLabs offers verified direct dials and email search without requiring a LinkedIn session, filtered by industry, headcount, region, and title, which covers the independence Prospeo offers without the phone-data tradeoff.
LSI keywords: LinkedIn Sales Navigator dependency, email finder accuracy 2026, B2B contact lookup tool, Wiza pricing breakdown, Prospeo credit system, verified email finder, LinkedIn extraction tool, contact data hit rate, sales prospecting tool comparison, mobile number lookup credits
7 B2B cold email templates built on what actually drives replies in 2026, with the reasoning behind every line. Copy, personalise, and send.
Snov.io vs Apollo compared on 2026 pricing, credit systems, and the exact usage point where a bundled outbound suite beats buying tools separately.
SalesIntel pricing is quote-only, but real contracts run $8,670 to $41,380 a year. Here is the math behind the number nobody puts on the pricing page.
No commitment. No credit card. Just 50 free verified contact lookups.