Lusha is great for individual prospectors but lacks team/agency features. Inbound Labs has bulk enrichment and multi-seat at the same price point. Our intent data filters don't exist in Lusha.
| Feature | Lusha | Inbound Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Email accuracy | ~90% | 98% verified ✓ |
| Mobile coverage | ~45M | 60M direct dials ✓ |
| Bulk enrichment | Limited | ✓ All paid plans ✓ |
| Multi-seat / agency support | Basic | Full workspaces + credit pools ✓ |
| Intent data filters | ✗ | ✓ (Growth+) ✓ |
| Job change alerts | ✗ | ✓ (Growth+) ✓ |
| Pricing | From $49/mo | From $49/mo |
| Chrome extension | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliant | ✓ | ✓ |
We believe in honest comparisons:
Lusha has a simpler, more streamlined UI for individual prospectors
Lusha's community-contributed data adds unique contact points
Lusha's onboarding is faster for single-user setups
Lusha's team features are basic. Inbound Labs has full workspace management and credit pools.
Lusha wasn't built for agencies. We have multi-client workspaces and white-label exports.
Lusha doesn't offer intent filters. If you want to target in-market buyers, switch to Inbound Labs.